<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tom Mitchell &#187; Boredom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tom.net.nz/category/boredom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tom.net.nz</link>
	<description>Life, the internets, and everything.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:19:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Phone 7.5 &#8220;Mango&#8221; Update &#8211; Hidden features</title>
		<link>http://tom.net.nz/2011/10/windows-phone-7-5-mango-update-hidden-features/</link>
		<comments>http://tom.net.nz/2011/10/windows-phone-7-5-mango-update-hidden-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boredom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.net.nz/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Mango has finally shipped, and I&#8217;ve been able to install it on my phone. I&#8217;m loving a bunch of the new features, especially: Unified messaging interface. Lets you seamlessly switch between Facebook chat, text, etc &#8211; in a single conversation. Linked inboxes, and conversation aggregation. You can view multiple email accounts from a single [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Mango has finally shipped, and I&#8217;ve been able to install it on my phone. I&#8217;m loving a bunch of the new features, especially:</p>
<ul>
<li>Unified messaging interface. Lets you seamlessly switch between Facebook chat, text, etc &#8211; in a single conversation.</li>
<li>Linked inboxes, and conversation aggregation. You can view multiple email accounts from a single tile, and emails belonging to a conversation are grouped together. Very, very useful.</li>
<li>Enhanced voice recognition. I just wrote a text to my girlfriend without touching the screen. Not to mention the fact that it nailed my (albeit simple) message body perfectly, first time.</li>
<li>Local Scout. While apps like Yelp were already useful for this sort of thing, having a &#8220;guide&#8221; to local eateries and attractions built right into the Maps is great.</li>
<li>Multi-tasking! Enough said.</li>
</ul>
<p>All of these (and many more features) are great, but what I&#8217;m especially loving is how many of my little &#8220;niggles&#8221; have been dealt to, without me even asking! Here&#8217;s a list of some of the smaller changes that I&#8217;ve noticed so far, but that probably wouldn&#8217;t make it into a press release:</p>
<ul>
<li>Snoozing an alarm now snoozes for 10 minutes instead of 5. This is a lifesaver&#8230; Can&#8217;t see any way to configure the timeout myself, though.</li>
<li>You can now switch off the camera shutter sound from the audio settings. That pervasive fake shutter noise is one of the most annoying things in the world &#8211; glad to be rid of it on my phone.</li>
<li>Music + Videos hub now opens right up to the &#8220;zune&#8221; section, ready for you to select music, videos, radio, etc &#8211; instead of the &#8220;history&#8221; section that it used to default to.</li>
<li>I use a PIN on my lock screen. You can now configure a &#8220;timeout&#8221;, whereby if you have already entered your PIN recently (say in the last 5 minutes), it won&#8217;t prompt you for the PIN for a second unlock within that period. Another great little feature &#8211; and one that I don&#8217;t see reproduced on other devices.</li>
</ul>
<p>This is a fantastic update that tackles a variety of problems with the original platform &#8211; both large and small.</p>
<p>However, even after all these great updates, I am still left with just one question; Why, oh why aren&#8217;t there bus directions in Maps?! I can get walking and car directions, but no bus. The ONE TIME I typically want to catch a bus is when I&#8217;m out and about, and only have my phone available. This is a HUGE oversight, and I was disappointed to not see it fixed in Mango.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tom.net.nz/2011/10/windows-phone-7-5-mango-update-hidden-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple: A hate story</title>
		<link>http://tom.net.nz/2010/08/apple-a-hate-story/</link>
		<comments>http://tom.net.nz/2010/08/apple-a-hate-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boredom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.net.nz/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To date, I have owned two iPods: An iPod video (5th Generation), and an iPod Touch (2nd Generation). I am going to start this post with a disclaimer: I like many things about my iPod Touch. It is lightweight, has a good battery life, and does most of what I need from it. Apps are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To date, I have owned two iPods: An iPod video (5th Generation), and an iPod Touch (2nd Generation). I am going to start this post with a disclaimer: I like many things about my iPod Touch. It is lightweight, has a good battery life, and does most of what I need from it. Apps are cool too. If given a choice, I would probably buy it again, and when I get another MP3 player, there is a good chance it will be another iPod.</p>
<p>That said, I have some major gripes with iTunes, and to a lesser extent, the iPod. Here they are, in no particular order:<br />
<span id="more-303"></span></p>
<h2>Performance</h2>
<p>This has always been my main issue with iTunes, and I&#8217;m sorry to say that even after 5 years of using it (give or take), and 5 years of hardware updates to my own computers, this is one gripe that has not gone away. iTunes is bloated, runs like a dog, and has a very sluggish interface. I just ran iTunes on my home PC, which has more than enough grunt to run games, do video editing, run Visual Studio and Photoshop and other resource hogging applications &#8211; and yet iTunes still took in excess of 10 seconds to load fully and display on the screen. Winamp 5.5 takes 2 seconds. Another sign of excessive bloat: iTunes&#8217; installer is 92MB, while Winamp weighs in at 10MB. This is a <em>serious </em>disconnect in size/performance for two pieces of software with very comparable feature sets. In fact, one could easily argue that Winamp is more customisable and more capable than iTunes.</p>
<p>I have iTunes loaded up with my entire music library, but I only use it for managing my iPod. However, even for this simple task I feel it falls over in terms of snappiness. For example, there is a good 3-5 seconds between clicking on my iPod in the navigation sidebar, and the iPod management interface actually appearing in the main window. During this pause, there is no indication that the application is doing anything. Moving around tabs and making changes within the interface results in similar sluggishness. Having used other applications (Winamp being my primary music player), it definitely feels like a major step backwards when I am forced to use iTunes for managing my iPod. There doesn&#8217;t seem to be any decent reason for such a performance hit or size difference to exist, and I can only assume it is due to wasteful or under-optimised source code, or the ridiculous amount of extra cruft that Apple likes to pack in with its software.</p>
<h2>Clunky interface</h2>
<p>Apple likes to tout its fare as being intuitive and user-friendly, while also taking a somewhat minimalist approach &#8211; with low configurability and ubiquitous interfaces. This is reflected in its insistence that iTunes not have the appearance of a normal Windows application. It is ironic, then, that there are so many interface oddities and quirks that mar its user-friendliness.</p>
<p>For example, to create a new playlist in iTunes, one can either go to File -&gt; New Playlist, or click the little &#8220;plus&#8221; icon at bottom right. Follow me so far? Now, to create a &#8220;smart&#8221; playlist, one must go to File -&gt; New Smart Playlist. However, there is no icon to do this&#8230; <em>Or is there?</em> Little known fact: by holding down the Shift key, the plus icon changes to a gear icon and allows the creation of a smart playlist. This interface behaviour (Shift + Click) is not consistent with virtually <em>any</em> other interface in Windows. I cannot for the life of me explain why they would implement such a feature. It doesn&#8217;t even appear to be used anywhere else within iTunes itself!</p>
<p><a href="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/itunes-new-playlist.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-371" title="itunes-new-playlist" src="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/itunes-new-playlist.png" alt="" width="400" height="19" /></a></p>
<p>This is only nitpicking of course. But I&#8217;m a software engineer; how could I <em>not</em> get riled up about an interface element that 99% of users wouldn&#8217;t even know exists, simply because it&#8217;s implemented in such a bizarre way.</p>
<p>Ok, ok, I&#8217;ll give you a more serious problem to think about. If you&#8217;ve used iTunes for any length of time, you have more than likely seen a dialog like the following:</p>
<p><a href="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/itunes-processing.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-372" title="itunes-processing" src="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/itunes-processing.png" alt="" width="369" height="87" /></a></p>
<p>This pops up whenever you add a large number of files to the library, and simultaneously stops you from doing anything else with the interface. You can&#8217;t even click the menus or the close button. Fortunately, many operations <em>do </em>get performed in the background, with this interface that also probably looks familiar if you have used iTunes:</p>
<p><a href="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/itunes-processing-bg.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-373" title="itunes-processing-bg" src="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/itunes-processing-bg.png" alt="" width="425" height="53" /></a></p>
<p>They clearly have the technology in place to perform background operations, and enough knowhow/developers to produce a 92MB download worth of bloated software &#8211; is background processing for adding files too much to ask for?</p>
<h2>Unnecessary software</h2>
<p>Part of the reason for the sheer size of iTunes is no doubt due to the swathe of extraneous features it has to support from the Apple family. For example, Apple TV, iPod Touch/iPhone Remote, AirTunes speakers, etc. These are of course all turned on by default, with very few easily accessible options for disabling them. Unless you&#8217;re an Apple Fanboi™, you probably own either none or one of these things, and you are certainly not gaining anything by having the other features turned on.</p>
<p>Related to supporting all these extraneous features, is the extra software that iTunes likes to install that runs alongside it. Particularly Windows services. A clean install of iTunes installs the following services:</p>
<ul>
<li>Apple Mobile Device</li>
<li>Bonjour Service</li>
<li>iPod Service</li>
</ul>
<p>In other words, even when you don&#8217;t have iTunes running, just installing it is bogging down your system with extraneous services, the purpose of which is not particularly clear. Side note: stopping iPod Service and Apple Mobile Device results in iTunes not being able to talk to my iPod. Why the <em>heck</em> should I need to run a Windows service to talk to a USB device? It boggles the mind&#8230;</p>
<p>Another major gripe I have, is that iTunes likes to install the Apple Software Update. This &#8220;helpfully&#8221; pops up whenever iTunes has an update (which I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily have a problem with), and then proceeds to &#8220;helpfully&#8221; preselect other Apple software for me to install when I click to update.</p>
<p><a href="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/apple-software-update.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-374" title="apple-software-update" src="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/apple-software-update.png" alt="" width="426" height="552" /></a></p>
<p>No, screw you, if I wanted Safari I would install it myself. MobileMe Control Panel?! I don&#8217;t even know what that is!</p>
<h2>Inconsistent iPod software updates</h2>
<p>Ok, moving on from iTunes&#8230; Here&#8217;s my biggest gripe with my iPod at the moment: Software updates breaking/changing past functionality.</p>
<p>I love my iPod Touch. Really, I do. 99% of the time, it&#8217;s great. However, I used to love it even more. Back in either version 1 or 2 of the OS (I forget which, exactly), double-tapping the Home button would always bring up little music player controls over whatever you were doing. I could be in a game, double-tap to bring up the controls, pause the music temporarily to hear something in the game &#8211; and then when I was done, double-tap and unpause again, and carry on with the game. It was seamless, easy, and ultimately worked really well.</p>
<p>However, in version 3 of iOS, the functionality just disappeared completely. Double-tapping in an app would just throw you back to the home screen. Major annoyance; they had completely removed probably my most used shortcut on the phone in one fell swoop.</p>
<p>A later update brought the functionality back&#8230; Kind of. Now (in iOS 4 at the time of writing), if you have music playing and you double-tap, you get the player mini controls overlaid on what you are currently doing. But, if you pause the music, close the controls, and double-tap again, you get thrown out of what you&#8217;re doing and the Music application fires up. I&#8217;ve been trying to avoid swearing in this post, but I really have to ask&#8230; What in the FUCK were they thinking with that one?! So it shows mini player controls, but only if you actually have something playing? And there&#8217;s no way to start something playing again without exiting what you&#8217;re currently doing? It&#8217;s inconsistent, doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense, and in my opinion, is <em>worse</em> than the older versions of the OS&#8230; And there doesn&#8217;t seem any significant reason for them to change it! At least give me the <em>option</em> of reverting to the old behaviour. But of course that would be just another option to clunk up the simplistic interface, am I right? (I&#8217;m being sarcastic &#8211; there is actually an option to set your desired double-tap behaviour, but frustratingly none of the options reinstate the old behaviour!)</p>
<p>Another major (MAJOR) gripe of mine with the iPod software, is the changes to how it handles compilations:</p>
<ul>
<li>In the early versions of the OS, when viewing the Album list, it was grouped purely by album name. No matter what songs were present in that album, and by what artists, they would all appear under a single heading. This behaviour was <em>perfect</em>. It required no special maintenance of music tags (which are notorious for being inconsistent/inaccurate), and it just <em>worked</em>. I don&#8217;t know why they felt they had to change it, but they did&#8230;</li>
<li>In recent versions, albums are now by default grouped by album name, then artist name. Meaning that a compilation now appears not as a single album, but ~20 albums with the same name, just different artists, with one or two songs in each album/artist combination. This was a genuine annoyance (particularly as I had an &#8220;album&#8221; with 1000 songs in it by different artists &#8211; which was now taking up swathes of room in my album view), but it could still be somewhat circumvented. By playing a song, then hitting the album button at top right in the Now Playing view, then hitting play on the first track, you could still get the whole album to play in a roundabout way. (If you didn&#8217;t do this, it would just play the single song with your selected album/artist combination).</li>
<li>Then, in iOS4, they broke my workaround&#8230; It&#8217;s hard to explain, but if I played a song in a particular album/artist combination, then the album view (from Now Playing) would show only that single song. Meaning if I wanted to play a compilation in order without any interaction from me, I had to create an On-The-Go playlist, and add each song individually, a tedious process taking roughly a couple minutes and involving upwards of 65 taps (3 per song, plus the taps to create/save the playlist). Are you fucking kidding me?</li>
<li>This effectively rendered my compilations useless, unless I felt like thumbing through and selecting each song in turn as the previous one finished playing. Of course there is an official way to get it to work (described below), but I pose the question: if it&#8217;s not broke then why try to fix it? The old way worked <em>perfectly</em> and <em>elegantly</em>, was there really a good reason to change?</li>
<li>In order to get the old behaviour back (compilations grouped as a single album), iTunes added the helpful (hah!) option to tag your music as &#8220;Part of a compilation&#8221;. Thanks, iTunes. Just what my music collection was missing all these years. Basically, this involved a good half hour of hunting through my music library for albums that looked like compilations, selecting the songs, opening a context menu, hitting Get Info, going to the Options tab, ticking a box, hitting OK, twiddling my thumbs waiting for a blocking dialog (like the Add Files dialog above) to finish, then moving on to the next album. All in all, an extremely tedious and time consuming operation. An operation that shouldn&#8217;t have been required in the first place, I might add. And I <em>still</em> missed a bunch of compilations and had to go back and repeat the process after syncing my iPod.</li>
<li>And now for the worst part: The &#8220;Part of a compilation&#8221; tickbox didn&#8217;t even have an effect for a number of my albums, and I haven&#8217;t the first clue why. A number of compilations are <em>still</em> showing up in my album list as ~20 albums with the same name, even with the option ticked. And there is no simple way to play all 20 albums (which are actually THE SAME FUCKING ALBUM) without tediously creating an On-The-Go playlist, meaning that I simply do not bother listening to these albums any more &#8211; which is exceedingly sad. Again, IT WASN&#8217;T FUCKING BROKEN, WHY DID YOU CHANGE IT APPLE?!</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/FFFUUU.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-375" title="FFFUUU" src="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/FFFUUU-300x228.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="228" /></a></p>
<p>Sorry about the caps and swearing, I&#8217;m getting a bit riled up here. Deep breaths. Deep breaths.</p>
<h2>Device compatibility</h2>
<p>Last on my list of gripes is Apple&#8217;s insistence on lack of backwards hardware support. As stated at the top of the article, I previously owned a 5th Generation iPod Video. Between that iPod and my current one, I have purchased a number of peripherals that have now effectively become expensive paperweights.</p>
<p>The first in this sad little list, is a wall charger. Since Apple helpfully neglects to include a wall charger with their products, I decided to buy one for my iPod Video. It worked great, although it had a USB female end, requiring me to use my iPod USB cord, plugging one end into the charger and the other into the iPod. A minor annoyance having to move around the cord all the time, but it was great on the road. Imagine my surprise then, when I discovered that the charger simply did not work with my iPod Touch. Maybe it doesn&#8217;t supply enough power, I&#8217;m not exactly sure; but for whatever reason, I can&#8217;t use it. It just doesn&#8217;t even recognise it&#8217;s plugged into anything. I can only assume it&#8217;s a change on Apple&#8217;s part.</p>
<p>Next up, a speaker dock. Thinking it would be handy to have a way to quickly drop my iPod Video into some speakers so that others could also enjoy my music, I purchased a speaker dock. It was great, sounded excellent for the size, and came with a remote that was able to control the docked iPod &#8211; so I could sit on my bed and change tracks, adjust the volume, etc. Enter the iPod Touch. Like the charger, the dock mysteriously just refused to work with the iPod Touch. The iPod didn&#8217;t acknowledge it was plugged into anything, and none of the controls on the dock worked. I don&#8217;t even know what to say here. I guess it&#8217;s not in Apple&#8217;s interests to have backwards compatibility, because then their Apple Fanbois™ would never have a reason to upgrade their peripherals (heaven forbid!) Another $100 down the drain, I guess. Thanks, Apple!</p>
<p>Finally, some <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/headphones/skullcandy-icon-soft-headphones/4505-7877_7-33712648.html">Skullcandy Icon</a> headphones. I&#8217;m not going to say much about them; they are ok for what they do, and weren&#8217;t <em>too</em> expensive (especially compared to some other Skullcandy offerings!) However, they did have the nice feature of having a button built into the cord that would let you play/pause the currently playing song, or skip to the next song with a double-tap. This was perfect for use on the mountain, as it meant I could pause the music to talk to someone, or skip a bad song, without having to unzip my jacket, unzip a pocket, get my glove off, etc etc. I actually purchased this item quite recently, so you can imagine my surprise when I upgraded to iOS 4, only to discover that the button no longer did anything. I cannot explain this. Basically, by &#8220;upgrading&#8221; the software <em>in the same piece of hardware</em>, I broke support for the device. In all honesty, I cannot see myself using the headphones without the use of the button &#8211; effectively rendering it just another paperweight. I might end up pulling the headphones apart and embedding the speakers in my helmet earpads &#8211; but that&#8217;s another story.</p>
<h2>In conclusion</h2>
<p>To summarise; I have a love/hate relationship with Apple. To be honest it&#8217;s mostly a hate relationship. My iPod is great, but even that is not without its significant flaws, and pretty much everything else about the Apple &#8220;experience&#8221; just leaves me with a horrid taste in my mouth. I was considering buying a Macbook Pro (and throwing Linux or Windows on it, of course), but I&#8217;m seriously reconsidering even that.</p>
<p>What are your thoughts on Apple (and particularly the iTunes/iPod platform)? Am I being too harsh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tom.net.nz/2010/08/apple-a-hate-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ch-ch-changes</title>
		<link>http://tom.net.nz/2010/03/ch-ch-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://tom.net.nz/2010/03/ch-ch-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boredom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intarwebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.net.nz/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just moved into a new flat. It&#8217;s pretty great (and my new room is like 3 times the size of my old one), but it&#8217;s going to take a week for our ISP to transfer our connection to the new address. Which means I&#8217;m limited to going online at work, and I&#8217;m going a little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just moved into a new flat. It&#8217;s pretty great (and my new room is like 3 times the size of my old one), but it&#8217;s going to take a week for our ISP to transfer our connection to the new address. Which means I&#8217;m limited to going online at work, and I&#8217;m going a little bonkers not being able to go online at home.</p>
<p>In other miscellaneous news, summer is wrapping up, which means that in about 3 months the ski season will be starting again &#8211; can&#8217;t wait! This year a few of us are planning a week-long South Island trip, which should be totally epic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tom.net.nz/2010/03/ch-ch-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A week in the life of Tom</title>
		<link>http://tom.net.nz/2010/03/a-week-in-the-life-of-tom/</link>
		<comments>http://tom.net.nz/2010/03/a-week-in-the-life-of-tom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boredom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.net.nz/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have been feeling a weird urge to design something lately. This was what I came up with. Open to ideas for things to do next. Click through to see full size. Addendum to key: PHOTOSHOP &#8211; 2 HOURS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have been feeling a weird urge to design something lately. This was what I came up with. Open to ideas for things to do next.</p>
<p><a href="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/toms-week.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-210" title="A Week In The Life Of Tom" src="http://tom.net.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/toms-week-212x300.png" alt="" width="212" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Click through to see full size.</p>
<p>Addendum to key: PHOTOSHOP &#8211; 2 HOURS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tom.net.nz/2010/03/a-week-in-the-life-of-tom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tarantino</title>
		<link>http://tom.net.nz/2010/03/tarantino/</link>
		<comments>http://tom.net.nz/2010/03/tarantino/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boredom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.net.nz/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christoph Waltz took home the Best Supporting Actor Oscar. Well deserved. Inglourious Basterds was the best movie of 2009, in my humble opinion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" title="Inglourious Basterds" src="http://img.moronail.net/img/1/1/1911.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="724" /></p>
<p>Christoph Waltz took home the Best Supporting Actor Oscar. Well deserved. Inglourious Basterds was the best movie of 2009, in my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tom.net.nz/2010/03/tarantino/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Space travel</title>
		<link>http://tom.net.nz/2010/02/space-travel/</link>
		<comments>http://tom.net.nz/2010/02/space-travel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boredom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.net.nz/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it seems that Obama has finally decided (roughly) what to do with the future of NASA. The new budget scraps the Constellation program (meaning direct funding won&#8217;t be going into an Apollo-recreating moon mission), but it does give funding to development of truly new concepts and technologies, where the Constellation program was more aimed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it seems that Obama has finally decided (roughly) what to do with the <a href="http://io9.com/5461719/its-time-to-get-serious-about-colonizing-space">future of NASA</a>.</p>
<p>The new budget scraps the Constellation program (meaning direct funding won&#8217;t be going into an Apollo-recreating moon mission), but it does give funding to development of truly <em>new</em> concepts and technologies, where the Constellation program was more aimed at repeating old science. Hopefully this scientific innovation not only contributes back to society in much the same way that many of the advances of the Apollo program did, but also works out as more useful in the long run for space colonisation and general space presence.</p>
<p>The funding also shifts the focus toward privatisation of space flight. <a href="http://www.spacex.com/">Private</a> <a href="http://www.virgingalactic.com/">companies</a> and <a href="http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/">prize pools</a> are already showing great promise, and we will likely see the first humans in space through these programs in a matter of years. Such a funding shift makes sense, and will likely accelerate the development of commercially viable spaceflight in a way that NASA would simply be unable to achieve.</p>
<p>Obama is also pushing to extend the International Space Station (ISS) program till 2020, which I think is another valuable step. It strikes me as a step backward to remove our only permanent space habitation from orbit.</p>
<p>The next 10 or so years will be very interesting indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tom.net.nz/2010/02/space-travel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The circle of leaf</title>
		<link>http://tom.net.nz/2010/02/the-circle-of-leaf/</link>
		<comments>http://tom.net.nz/2010/02/the-circle-of-leaf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boredom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.net.nz/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via BuzzFeed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" title="Circle of leaf" src="http://s.buzzfed.com/static/imagebuzz/terminal01/2010/2/1/13/the-circle-of-leaf-20823-1265047755-5.jpg" alt="" width="499" height="501" /></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/awesomer/the-circle-of-leaf">BuzzFeed</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tom.net.nz/2010/02/the-circle-of-leaf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Project &#8220;writer&#8217;s&#8221; block</title>
		<link>http://tom.net.nz/2009/10/project-writers-block/</link>
		<comments>http://tom.net.nz/2009/10/project-writers-block/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boredom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intarwebs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.net.nz/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve recently been trying to think of a good idea for a pet website project, and drawing a complete blank. I&#8217;m looking for a simple concept that will be effective and clever, but hasn&#8217;t already been totally overdone. Preferably with a social aspect to it. I&#8217;ve been thinking about this for a good few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;ve recently been trying to think of a good idea for a pet website project, and drawing a complete blank.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking for a simple concept that will be effective and clever, but hasn&#8217;t already been totally overdone. Preferably with a social aspect to it. I&#8217;ve been thinking about this for a good few weeks, and still haven&#8217;t come up with anything worthwhile. Ideas welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tom.net.nz/2009/10/project-writers-block/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m watching</title>
		<link>http://tom.net.nz/2009/09/what-im-watching/</link>
		<comments>http://tom.net.nz/2009/09/what-im-watching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boredom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.net.nz/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hurrah for a new TV season! Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m watching at the moment: American Dad Curb Your Enthusiasm Dexter Dollhouse Entourage Family Guy Greek Heroes How I Met Your Mother Robot Chicken The Office As well as catching up on some movies, and attempting to get up to speed on It&#8217;s Always Sunny In Philadelphia. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurrah for a new TV season! Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m watching at the moment:</p>
<ul>
<li>American Dad</li>
<li>Curb Your Enthusiasm</li>
<li>Dexter</li>
<li>Dollhouse</li>
<li>Entourage</li>
<li>Family Guy</li>
<li>Greek</li>
<li>Heroes</li>
<li>How I Met Your Mother</li>
<li>Robot Chicken</li>
<li>The Office</li>
</ul>
<p>As well as catching up on some movies, and attempting to get up to speed on It&#8217;s Always Sunny In Philadelphia. Where do I find the time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tom.net.nz/2009/09/what-im-watching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-nerdy stuff</title>
		<link>http://tom.net.nz/2009/09/non-nerdy-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://tom.net.nz/2009/09/non-nerdy-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boredom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.net.nz/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well it seems that lately my blog has devolved into nerdy rants about programming and web design and other such things. I shall now attempt to write the wrong. It is now nearing the end of the ski season, and (although I&#8217;m not 100% sure on the exact number) I believe I&#8217;m up to about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it seems that lately my blog has devolved into nerdy rants about programming and web design and other such things. I shall now attempt to write the wrong.</p>
<p>It is now nearing the end of the ski season, and (although I&#8217;m not 100% sure on the exact number) I believe I&#8217;m up to about 20 days on the mountain this season, which is not half bad as far as predominantly weekend trips go! My new board has survived relatively unscathed, with only a few superficial scratches. All in all I&#8217;m pretty happy with my purchase. It&#8217;s quite a big investment money-wise; if I put together all the money I&#8217;ve spent on getting my ass to the snow this year I could have purchased a half-decent car. I wish that was an exaggeration. Ahh well, it&#8217;s been a blast, I don&#8217;t regret it for a second! Unfortunately the snowmelt on Ruapehu is getting pretty extensive, it will only be any good for another week or two &#8211; unless there is a big cold snap &#8211; but I&#8217;m not holding my breath. The snow that is there isn&#8217;t particularly good, either; most days everything slushes up on-trail by about 11am, necessitating finding little patches of off-trail goodness.</p>
<p>Last week I went for some mid-week skiing Thursday/Friday, and stayed in one of the lodges on the mountain at Whakapapa &#8211; which was pretty damn awesome! Rolling out of bed, throwing on some clothing, and making the 3 minute walk up to the lifts is so bloody convenient. On Friday, a few places had some windblown pockets of fresh powder, so we decided to hike up above the lift-accessed areas a few times, and dropped into a couple of untouched bowls. There is nothing quite like fresh tracks in powder on a bluebird day. I can only describe it as epic. It&#8217;s runs like those that really make a season.</p>
<p>In other news, I&#8217;m listening to the new Muse album, and it&#8217;s bloody great. <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAlbum?id=326492721&amp;s=143441&amp;uo=1&amp;v0=9991" target="_blank">Get it</a>. While I&#8217;m on the topic of music, I&#8217;ve recently jumped on the dubstep bandwagon. It&#8217;s quite a cool little upcoming genre, and it&#8217;s really grown on me in the last few months. I blame <a href="http://upfm.dj/">UP FM</a>.</p>
<p>This post has zero flow; congratulations if you made it this far through all the waffle. My apologies. Did you catch the pun in the first paragraph? I thought it was quite clever. Yes I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tom.net.nz/2009/09/non-nerdy-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

