Disillusioned with Facebook

Like more than 400 million other people on this planet, I belong to a little site called Facebook. I was what you might call an “early adopter”, at least in New Zealand. I joined when the site was only open to university/college students (requiring one to have a university email to register). I believe it had been running for a couple years before they added New Zealand universities to those eligible for registration. I was literally within the first hundred or so people to sign up for it at the University of Auckland, on the 26th of February, 2006.

That’s more than 4 years ago now, and it’s kind of saddening to see how Facebook has changed in that time. When I first joined, I immediately liked it for the following reasons:

Overall, it just felt much nicer and cleaner than anything I’d used before. I promptly told all my university-attending friends about it, and a few months later, ditched the other three sites. Then started the slow and steady decline. You may or may not have been around to see some of these changes:

Perhaps even more worrying, is how few people are actually even aware of this erosion of privacy. Facebook have done a good job of keeping it pretty well hidden, or glazed over as “enhancing the experience”. Of course, most people (myself included) don’t read privacy policies (often pages and pages worth) every few months.

Of course, a social networking site is only useful if there are a good proportion of the people you care about using it. With that in mind, Facebook is still good from the perspective of sharing photos, organising events, and communicating with friends. However, I have stripped most of my personal information from the site (bar photos), and will gladly move to a new platform if it can grab me in the same way that Facebook did when it first appeared on the scene.

In particular, I’ll be keeping an eye on Diaspora, an intriguing project about to start development, which promises to deliver on the concept of an “open source” social network. In a nutshell, it’s a network of personal “nodes”. Each person on the network owns their own node, to which they can add whatever information they like, and access it from anywhere. In turn, they have fine-grained control over who can see that information. Think about it like your own personal house that contains your personal information (basically everything that you’d otherwise be sharing on Facebook/Flickr/LastFM/Twitter/etc), and you can open the door two whomever you (and only you) choose. Because you own the house, you can demolish it at any time, or add and remove furniture as you please. It’s also being developed by a bunch of super nerds, so I can totally get behind it:

Hopefully it amounts to something! My biggest concern is that it’s very technical and geeky at this point in time, so they will need a good marketing team with a pitch for the masses before it gains any real ground.

2 Responses to “Disillusioned with Facebook”

  1. Lauren says:

    Hey that looks really interesting, going to have a look at the site now.

    I didnt realise keeping your facebook private means private from other people but not private from third parties… ftl going to strip my page now. >.<

  2. Sam says:

    Hey yeah, I was what I guess you would call an “early early” adopter, since I got one of my friends in the States to give me a spare university email address and I was in there before it was even open to NZ.

    I must agree that it was way better back in the day. I remember when all of the apps etc were originally being offered, there was this big divide between the Facebook “Purists” and the Neo-Facebookians. The Purists kept their profiles absolutely immaculate. I don’t think there are any of those left.

    NOW EVERYONE GO TO http://www.themissionaryfilm.com and Tom, BLOG ABOUT IT.

Leave a Reply